Hi, I'm Liz. Welcome to my IELTS tips, model answers and practice

1. To pursue absolute security is to pursue a will-'o-the-wisp. Security (of all kinds) is relative. We can never be "safe" -- we can only be "safer" or "less safe".

…cite experts who agree with you

Quotes - Direct quotes from leading experts that support your position are invaluable.

…claim to be an expert if you’re not one

Luke 23:3 - regards the chief priests, rulers, and "the people" as being of the same mind (How likely is this, unless "the people" in question are ALREADY on their side?)

…provide facts, evidence, and statistics to support your position

John - refers to "the Jews" as being who did the shouting - and as we have seen above, for John, "the Jews" in context means, "the establishment"

Examples - Examples enhance your meaning and make your ideas concrete. They are the proof.

can’t we discuss like agree and dis agree and concluded them at once

Winter, I would say, probably has the correct answer in context: The other Gospel writers did not mention the Roman soldiers because they wished to convince their readers of the "unpolitical character of the message of salvation through Jesus." But that assumes, again, that they were there in the first place, which is by no means certain.

Thanks liz it helps me most to solve every confusion……

So while the security theater failed, the overall security didn't, largely due to incompetence / luck that the shoe bomb didn't light or detonate quickly, observant passengers, and flight crew response.

Already a print edition subscriber, but don't have a login?

And this, indeed, may be so: Perhaps the Jewish leaders DID expect some major resistance from Jesus and His followers. But I say that beyond this, there was a further role for those soldiers to play, IF they were there - and we will get to that, later on.

You MUST choose one side or the other when you write an argument paper!

Develop your IELTS skills with tips, lessons, free videos and more.

Privacy has no constituency in government. Security has the most powerful and budgetarily-seductive constituency in government. As a bureaucratic matter, there is only one possible outcome of this imbalance, and it's not pretty. Those references to East Germany are going to seem less and less eccentric as time goes on.

…use weak qualifiers like “I believe,” “I feel,” or “I think”—just tell us!

Your essay should be formal in content, not informal.

Aye. I can personally address enough risks to myself and family that I don't need a buncha other guys elbowing into that space, even if they think they can do it better. Mostly because there are levels of access to peoples' lives that it's stupid to trust other people with, especially in an age where capabilities to garner that access are growing faster than the accountability needed to oversee their use of it.

…assume the audience will agree with you about any aspect of your argument

IELTS Videos, IELTS Tips & IELTS Lessons for Free

Hi, my name is Elizabeth (Liz). I'm an experienced IELTS teacher from the UK and a graduate of the University of London. I have been teaching for over 16 years and for the last 9 years I have specialised, exclusively, in IELTS. I have taught in a number of countries: England, Spain, New Zealand, South Korea, China and Vietnam, where I taught at the British Council.