Scientific Research And Essays Impact Factors

With the vast amount information available today, researchers rely on citation indices to identify the best resources for their research. Bringing together scholarly book, journal and conference proceedings literature within Web of Science, optimizes the powerful features of citation navigation. This provides researchers with access to the citation network between books and the wider world of scholarly and scientific research, allowing them to measure the contribution of books in specific disciplines and identify potential collaborators.

Scientific research and essays ..

Scientific Research and Essays [ISI Science Citation Index] ..

scientific research and essays science ..

An important step towards countering these bad practices was made with the formulation of the San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment. However, DORA does not go far enough. It emphasizes that funders and institutions should acknowledge that "the scientific content of a paper is much more important than publication metrics or the identity of the journal in which it was published" and that publishers should "greatly reduce emphasis on the journal impact factor as a promotional tool". 'DORA 2' is now needed, which eradicates the use of all publication metrics for evaluations of authors' scientific contributions and the use of 'impact factors' as an indicator of journal quality. Academic institutions, funding agencies and bodies representing professional scientists should engage to generate a 'DORA 2' and to vigorously promote its universal application.

Scientific Research And Essays Impact Factor 2012

Major flaws that are seen include the sub-division of bodies of research into multiple papers that are salami-sliced to reduce them to the smallest publishable unit; operation of biased and non-transparent editorial and refereeing processes producing results that in some cases appear to be unreliable and in others little better than the throw of a dice; the pursuit of models of 'open access' that present financial barriers to the authors and work against the interests of scientists in poorer countries; the use, by a range of evaluators, of metrics based on the mechanical extraction of publication and citation data which is fundamentally skewed, readily gamed by authors and publishers and ignores qualitative assessment of the intrinsic value of the contribution made by each scientist to their discipline; and exploitation of the system by authors seeking academic credit through falsified results and by operators of predatory and fake journals motivated only by financial returns.

Scientific research and essays isi web. Coursework Service
The rate of growth in scientific publication and the decline in coverage provided by Science Citation Index

Completing the Research Picture

Conceptually, the system can be viewed as comprising three sub-systems (Figure 1). (i) At its core is the science advancement system of communicating results through peer-reviewed papers. This sits at the intersection of (ii) the financial system that rewards the publisher, with the revenues being derived either from fees paid by authors (for the 'publishing costs' or to provide 'open access' to readers) or by users (subscribers to the journals or those who purchase a copy of an individual paper); and (iii) the reputational system, through which the authors gain standing based on assessment of their contributions to the stock of scientific knowledge (bringing rewards in increased access to resources to conduct more research and in career progression) and the publishers gain prestige (which can lead to higher prices and profits and to attract more authors) from publishing the most 'important' science. The reputational system has relied increasingly on using journal metrics (numbers of papers and citations of them, linked with the 'impact factors' of the journals in which they appear) and decreasingly on the qualitative evaluation by experts of the fundamental importance of the author's contributions to scientific knowledge.

Scientific research and essays

Research Databases Alphabetical List - Michael …

Recognizing the pressing need to improve the ways in which the output of scientific research is evaluated, a group of editors and publishers meeting during a science conference in 2012 developed a set of recommendations, referred to as the San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment (DORA) [80]. Three central themes run through the 18 DORA recommendations, which stress the need to:

By James Testa, Vice President, Editorial Development & Publisher Relations

Social Sciences Citation Index - Clarivate Analytics

Severino Antinori. This doctor recently held a press conference announcing that the first human clone will be born in early January of next year. The article implies that Antinori might not be making reliable claims, and that most of the scientific community is skeptical about Antiorni's truthfulness because he has not come up with any proof. But this was not is the most disturbing part of the article. The piece quoted several renowned scientists, and they all seemed to be saying the same thing. Michael Le Page, the biomedical news editor of New Scientist magazine said, "If anyone cloned a human baby I would be surprised if they would make an immediate announcement." Le Page also said that if a cloned baby was made public, and that a year or so later showed signs of deformity or retardation the scientist would look, "a bit silly." It absolutely boggles my mind that these scientists are talking about a human life. They're talking about causing the retardation of a human child, and the only consequence they mention is that the scientist might look "a bit silly." The scientists say that even if a human baby had been cloned, the public would be the last to know, because the researchers are worried about their image.



John Kilner, the president of a U.S.