St Anselm's Ontological Argument

For the final paper, you should choose one reading that we have gone over during the course, and either argue for or against the main thesis in that reading. For example, you might argue for or against Mill’s theory of utilitarianism, Anselm’s ontological argument, Descartes’s argument for dualism, and so forth. I AM ARGUING FOR THE MAIN THESIS!
Your paper should have the following structure:
1)Introduction: Explain what your paper will attempt to argue, and what your conclusion is. Explain the thesis you will be discussing and how the philosopher in question defends it.
2) Exposition: Explain the viewpoint of the philosopher you are discussing so that someone who had not read the material before would be able to have a clear sense of what they said, why it matters, and why they believed as they did.
3) Argument: Present your main argument for or against the thesis in question. It can help if you break the argument down into premise/conclusin format athough this is not essential.
3b) Objection: Present what you think the most serious objection to your main argument is. Present it clearly and explain how someone who holds the opposite conclusion from your own might argue.
3c) Rebuttal: Present your response to the objection, explaining why it fails and why your initial argument stands.
4) Conclusion: Present your conclusion, and explain clearly why the reader should accept it.
If you want to send me rough drafts of your paper, you may do so and I will return them to you with comments and suggestions.

Anselm’s Ontological Argument; 9

In this case, the discussion is on Saint Anselm and his Ontological Argument.

Free ontological argument Essays and Papers - 123HelpMe

In the case of Anselm’s ontological argument, the hypothesis treated in this way is the hypothesis that God does not exist. Anselm’s argument rests upon the conception of God as “that than which no greater can be conceived”. It is this conception of God with which the hypothesis that God does not exist is supposed to conflict.

Free ontological argument papers, essays, and research papers.

Finally, there has been some activity in journals. The mostsignificant of these pieces is Millican 2004, the first article onontological arguments in recent memory to appear inMind. Millican argues for a novel interpretation of Anselm’sargument, and for a new critique of ontological arguments derivingfrom this interpretation. Needless to say, both the interpretation andthe critique are controversial, but they are also worthy ofattention. Among other journal articles, perhaps the most interestingare Pruss 2010, which provides a novel defence of the key possibilitypremise in modal ontological arguments, and Pruss 2009, whichkick-started recent discussion of higher-order ontologicalarguments. There is also a chain of papers in Analysisinitiated by Matthews and Baker (2010)

The ontological argument was introduced by Anselm of Canterbury in his book Proslogion.
If Descartes really means `Reality', how does the Ontological Argument look?

Free Essays on Anselm's Ontological Argument

Anselm's ontological argument concerns existence and whether it is an attribute of God in the same way omnipotence, omniscience and benevolence are believed to be.

The ontological argument argues that if you understand what it means to talk about God, you will see His existence is necessarily true....

Essay Anselm's Ontological Argument - 1281 Words | …

Is there a convincing version of the ontological argument?
The term 'the ontological argument' refers to a broad family of arguments for the existence of God, all of which share the characteristic of arguing from conceptual or a priori grounds to God's existence. A general ontological argument will inevitably suggest, in some fashion, that when we consider fully the correct idea or concept of God, and what this concept entails, the actual existence of this God is seen to be undeniable. This style of argument for God's existence is traditionally considered to have begun with Anselm of Canterbury, and we should begin our consideration of the argument there, detailing briefly the development of the argument, before moving on to consider the increasingly sophisticated, if ultimately no more successful, ontological arguments of Descartes, and more recently of Plantinga. I intend to show, and thus conclude, that whilst the ontological argument has, over time, been refined and reworked and at times might have appeared troubling to the atheist, it remains even in its strongest forms both intuitively unconvincing and demonstrably false. We might consider that the argument put forward by Anselm was the earliest complete form of the ontological argument. Anselm began by proposing a definition of God as 'that than which nothing greater can be conceived', and that we all, even the 'fool' atheist, have such an idea of God in our minds. Anselm's argument from this point runs thus: (1) I can conceive of a being than which nothing greater can be conceived. (2) This being exists thus only in my mind. (3) But, an equivalent being that also exists in reality would be greater than the original being. (4) Thus I cannot coherently maintain that such a being exists only in my mind.

Anselm of eleventh century, and Descartes of seventeenth century, have used the ontological argument for proving the existence of God.

Anselm’s Ontological Argument - 1229 Palabras | Cram

In more recent times, Kurt Gödel, Charles Hartshorne, NormanMalcolm and Alvin Plantinga have all presented much-discussedontological arguments which bear interesting connections to the earlierarguments of St. Anselm, Descartes and Leibniz. Of these, the mostinteresting are those of Gödel and Plantinga; in these cases,however, it is unclear whether we should really say that these authorsclaim that the arguments are proofs of the existence ofGod.