.Neil Postman, (New York, 1993), 144-63, and .
Rawls's doctrine of public reason can be summarized as follows:
All citizens are assumed to have fundamental interests in getting moreof these primary goods, and political institutions are to evaluate howwell citizens are doing according to what primary goods they have. Itis equalities and inequalities of these primary goods that, Rawlsclaims, are of the greatest political significance.
Rawls describes the fundamental interests of a people as follows:
Rawls's conception of society is defined by fairness: socialinstitutions are to be fair to all cooperating members of society,regardless of their race, gender, religion, class of origin, naturaltalents, reasonable conception of the good life, and so on.
Nanotechnology: Science & Technology Essays - 2005
.Eric Ketelaar, “The Difference BestPostponed?Cultures and ComparativeArchival Science,” 44 (Fall 1997): 142-48, reprinted inHorsman, Ketelaar, and Thomassen (eds.), 21-27.
Join the conversation at CRNtalk
Political power is used legitimately in a liberal society when it isused in accordance with a political conception of justice. Yet thechallenge of stability remains: why will citizens willingly obey thelaw as specified by a liberal political conception? Legitimacy meansthat the law may permissibly be enforced; Rawls still needs to explainwhy citizens have reasons, from within their own points of view, toabide by such a law. If citizens do not believe they have suchreasons, social order may disintegrate.
Social Science History Bibliography - Andrew Roberts
Rawls places his hopes for social stability on an overlappingconsensus. In an overlapping consensus, citizens all endorse acore set of laws for different reasons. In Rawlsian terms, eachcitizen supports a political conception of justice for reasonsinternal to her own comprehensive doctrine.